ASUS TUF Gaming VG32WQ3B vs Corsair XENEON 32QHD165
ASUS TUF Gaming VG32WQ3B
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 180 Hz · VACorsair XENEON 32QHD165
32″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSASUS TUF Gaming VG32WQ3B and Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 74.
- Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG32WQ3B leads (180 Hz vs 165 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS TUF Gaming VG32WQ3B leads (1 ms vs 3 ms).
ASUS TUF Gaming VG32WQ3B
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS TUF Gaming VG32WQ3B | Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 | |
|---|---|---|
| 75 | Gear score | 74 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 180 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| VA | Panel | IPS |
| 1 ms | Response time | 3 ms |
| ≈ $289 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS TUF Gaming VG32WQ3B or Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 better?
ASUS TUF Gaming VG32WQ3B and Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 74. Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG32WQ3B leads (180 Hz vs 165 Hz). Response time: ASUS TUF Gaming VG32WQ3B leads (1 ms vs 3 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG32WQ3B leads (180 Hz vs 165 Hz).