Monitors / Comparison
ASUS VW22AT-CSM vs Eizo S1933H-BK
Monitor · ASUS
ASUS VW22AT-CSM
22″ · 1680×1050 · 60 Hz · TNEntry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution46
Panel50
Response time50
VS
Monitor · Eizo
Eizo S1933H-BK
19″ · 1280×1024 · 60 Hz · IPSEntry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution33
Panel80
Response time30
Verdict
ASUS VW22AT-CSM and Eizo S1933H-BK are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 35 and 36.
- Resolution: ASUS VW22AT-CSM leads (1680×1050 vs 1280×1024).
- Response time: ASUS VW22AT-CSM leads (5 ms vs 14 ms).
Pick this
ASUS VW22AT-CSM
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS VW22AT-CSM | Eizo S1933H-BK | |
|---|---|---|
| 35 | Gear score | 36 |
| 22″ | Screen size | 19″ |
| 1680×1050 | Resolution | 1280×1024 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| TN | Panel | IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 14 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS VW22AT-CSM or Eizo S1933H-BK better?
ASUS VW22AT-CSM and Eizo S1933H-BK are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 35 and 36. Resolution: ASUS VW22AT-CSM leads (1680×1050 vs 1280×1024). Response time: ASUS VW22AT-CSM leads (5 ms vs 14 ms).