Monitors / Comparison
Eizo S1933H-BK vs Samsung BX2350
Monitor · Eizo
Eizo S1933H-BK
19″ · 1280×1024 · 60 Hz · IPSEntry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution33
Panel80
Response time30
VS
Monitor · Samsung
Samsung BX2350
23″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · 2010Entry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Response time78
Recency20
Verdict
Eizo S1933H-BK and Samsung BX2350 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 36 and 36.
- Resolution: Samsung BX2350 leads (1920×1080 vs 1280×1024).
- Response time: Samsung BX2350 leads (2 ms vs 14 ms).
Pick this
Samsung BX2350
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Eizo S1933H-BK | Samsung BX2350 | |
|---|---|---|
| 36 | Gear score | 36 |
| 19″ | Screen size | 23″ |
| 1280×1024 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | — |
| 14 ms | Response time | 2 ms |
| — | Release year | 2010 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Eizo S1933H-BK or Samsung BX2350 better?
Eizo S1933H-BK and Samsung BX2350 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 36 and 36. Resolution: Samsung BX2350 leads (1920×1080 vs 1280×1024). Response time: Samsung BX2350 leads (2 ms vs 14 ms).