Monitors / Comparison
ASUS VW22AT-CSM vs Samsung NS240
Monitor · ASUS
ASUS VW22AT-CSM
22″ · 1680×1050 · 60 Hz · TNEntry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution46
Panel50
Response time50
VS
Monitor · Samsung
Samsung NS240
24″ · 1920×1200 · 60 HzEntry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution57
Response time50
Verdict
ASUS VW22AT-CSM and Samsung NS240 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 35 and 35.
- Resolution: Samsung NS240 leads (1920×1200 vs 1680×1050).
Pick this
Samsung NS240
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS VW22AT-CSM | Samsung NS240 | |
|---|---|---|
| 35 | Gear score | 35 |
| 22″ | Screen size | 24″ |
| 1680×1050 | Resolution | 1920×1200 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| TN | Panel | — |
| 5 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS VW22AT-CSM or Samsung NS240 better?
ASUS VW22AT-CSM and Samsung NS240 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 35 and 35. Resolution: Samsung NS240 leads (1920×1200 vs 1680×1050).
Similar comparisons
ASUS VW22AT-CSM vs BenQ BL2201PUASUS VW22AT-CSM vs LG 22EB23P-BASUS VW22AT-CSM vs LG 22MB65P-BASUS VW22AT-CSM vs Samsung 2443BWT-1ASUS VW22AT-CSM vs Samsung 2443BWT-TAA-1Samsung NS240 vs BenQ BL2201PUSamsung NS240 vs Samsung 2443BWT-1Samsung NS240 vs Samsung 2443BWT-TAA-1Samsung NS240 vs Samsung S22E450BW