Monitors / Comparison
Samsung NS240 vs Samsung S22E450BW
Monitor · Samsung
Samsung NS240
24″ · 1920×1200 · 60 HzEntry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution57
Response time50
VS
Monitor · Samsung
Samsung S22E450BW
22″ · 1680×1050 · 60 Hz · TNEntry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution46
Panel50
Response time50
Verdict
Samsung NS240 and Samsung S22E450BW are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 35 and 35.
- Resolution: Samsung NS240 leads (1920×1200 vs 1680×1050).
Pick this
Samsung NS240
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Samsung NS240 | Samsung S22E450BW | |
|---|---|---|
| 35 | Gear score | 35 |
| 24″ | Screen size | 22″ |
| 1920×1200 | Resolution | 1680×1050 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| — | Panel | TN |
| 5 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Samsung NS240 or Samsung S22E450BW better?
Samsung NS240 and Samsung S22E450BW are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 35 and 35. Resolution: Samsung NS240 leads (1920×1200 vs 1680×1050).