ASUS VW22AT-CSM vs Samsung T190GN
ASUS VW22AT-CSM
22″ · 1680×1050 · 60 Hz · TNSamsung T190GN
19″ · 1440×900 · 60 Hz · TNASUS VW22AT-CSM and Samsung T190GN are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 35 and 35.
- Resolution: ASUS VW22AT-CSM leads (1680×1050 vs 1440×900).
- Response time: Samsung T190GN leads (2 ms vs 5 ms).
ASUS VW22AT-CSM
If you care most about resolution.
Samsung T190GN
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS VW22AT-CSM | Samsung T190GN | |
|---|---|---|
| 35 | Gear score | 35 |
| 22″ | Screen size | 19″ |
| 1680×1050 | Resolution | 1440×900 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| TN | Panel | TN |
| 5 ms | Response time | 2 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS VW22AT-CSM or Samsung T190GN better?
ASUS VW22AT-CSM and Samsung T190GN are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 35 and 35. Resolution: ASUS VW22AT-CSM leads (1680×1050 vs 1440×900). Response time: Samsung T190GN leads (2 ms vs 5 ms).