Samsung NS240 vs Samsung T190GN
Samsung NS240
24″ · 1920×1200 · 60 HzSamsung T190GN
19″ · 1440×900 · 60 Hz · TNSamsung NS240 and Samsung T190GN are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 35 and 35.
- Resolution: Samsung NS240 leads (1920×1200 vs 1440×900).
- Response time: Samsung T190GN leads (2 ms vs 5 ms).
Samsung NS240
If you care most about resolution.
Samsung T190GN
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Samsung NS240 | Samsung T190GN | |
|---|---|---|
| 35 | Gear score | 35 |
| 24″ | Screen size | 19″ |
| 1920×1200 | Resolution | 1440×900 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| — | Panel | TN |
| 5 ms | Response time | 2 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Samsung NS240 or Samsung T190GN better?
Samsung NS240 and Samsung T190GN are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 35 and 35. Resolution: Samsung NS240 leads (1920×1200 vs 1440×900). Response time: Samsung T190GN leads (2 ms vs 5 ms).