BenQ BL2420PT vs Samsung U32D970Q
BenQ BL2420PT
23.8″ · 2560×1440 · 60 Hz · IPSSamsung U32D970Q
31.5″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · PLSBenQ BL2420PT and Samsung U32D970Q are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 51 and 51.
- Resolution: Samsung U32D970Q leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Response time: BenQ BL2420PT leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).
BenQ BL2420PT
If you care most about response time.
Samsung U32D970Q
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ BL2420PT | Samsung U32D970Q | |
|---|---|---|
| 51 | Gear score | 51 |
| 23.8″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | PLS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 8 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ BL2420PT or Samsung U32D970Q better?
BenQ BL2420PT and Samsung U32D970Q are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 51 and 51. Resolution: Samsung U32D970Q leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Response time: BenQ BL2420PT leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).