BenQ EW2780Q vs Samsung U32D970Q
BenQ EW2780Q
27″ · 2560×1440 · 60 Hz · IPSSamsung U32D970Q
31.5″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · PLSBenQ EW2780Q and Samsung U32D970Q are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 51 and 51.
- Resolution: Samsung U32D970Q leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Response time: BenQ EW2780Q leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).
BenQ EW2780Q
If you care most about response time.
Samsung U32D970Q
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ EW2780Q | Samsung U32D970Q | |
|---|---|---|
| 51 | Gear score | 51 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | PLS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 8 ms |
| ≈ $398 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ EW2780Q or Samsung U32D970Q better?
BenQ EW2780Q and Samsung U32D970Q are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 51 and 51. Resolution: Samsung U32D970Q leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Response time: BenQ EW2780Q leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).