Monitors / Comparison
BenQ BL3200PT vs Eizo CS270-BK-CN
Monitor · BenQ
BenQ BL3200PT
32″ · 2560×1440 · 60 Hz · VAAverage
Refresh rate15
Resolution80
Panel66
Response time60
VS
Monitor · Eizo
Eizo CS270-BK-CN
27″ · 2560×1440 · 60 Hz · IPSAverage
Refresh rate15
Resolution80
Panel80
Response time30
Verdict
BenQ BL3200PT and Eizo CS270-BK-CN are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 49 and 49.
- Response time: BenQ BL3200PT leads (4 ms vs 15 ms).
Pick this
BenQ BL3200PT
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ BL3200PT | Eizo CS270-BK-CN | |
|---|---|---|
| 49 | Gear score | 49 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| VA | Panel | IPS |
| 4 ms | Response time | 15 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ BL3200PT or Eizo CS270-BK-CN better?
BenQ BL3200PT and Eizo CS270-BK-CN are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 49 and 49. Response time: BenQ BL3200PT leads (4 ms vs 15 ms).
Similar comparisons
BenQ BL3200PT vs BenQ BL2381TBenQ BL3200PT vs BenQ EW2770QZBenQ BL3200PT vs BenQ PD3200QBenQ BL3200PT vs ASUS Designo MX279HSBenQ BL3200PT vs ASUS ProArt Display PA248CRVEizo CS270-BK-CN vs ASUS Designo MX279HSEizo CS270-BK-CN vs ASUS ProArt Display PA248CRVEizo CS270-BK-CN vs ASUS ProArt Display PA248QVEizo CS270-BK-CN vs BenQ BL2381T