ASUS ProArt Display PA248QV vs Eizo CS270-BK-CN
ASUS ProArt Display PA248QV
24.1″ · 1920×1200 · 75 Hz · IPSEizo CS270-BK-CN
27″ · 2560×1440 · 60 Hz · IPSASUS ProArt Display PA248QV and Eizo CS270-BK-CN are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 49 and 49.
- Resolution: Eizo CS270-BK-CN leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1200).
- Refresh rate: ASUS ProArt Display PA248QV leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS ProArt Display PA248QV leads (5 ms vs 15 ms).
ASUS ProArt Display PA248QV
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Eizo CS270-BK-CN
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA248QV | Eizo CS270-BK-CN | |
|---|---|---|
| 49 | Gear score | 49 |
| 24.1″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 1920×1200 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 75 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 15 ms |
| ≈ $169 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA248QV or Eizo CS270-BK-CN better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA248QV and Eizo CS270-BK-CN are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 49 and 49. Resolution: Eizo CS270-BK-CN leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1200). Refresh rate: ASUS ProArt Display PA248QV leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: ASUS ProArt Display PA248QV leads (5 ms vs 15 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS ProArt Display PA248QV leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).