Monitors / Comparison
BenQ EW2770QZ vs LG W3000H-Bn
Monitor · BenQ
BenQ EW2770QZ
27″ · 2560×1440 · 60 Hz · IPSAverage
Refresh rate15
Resolution80
Panel80
Response time30
VS
Monitor · LG
LG W3000H-Bn
30″ · 2560×1600 · 60 Hz · IPS · 2007Average
Refresh rate15
Resolution83
Panel80
Response time50
Recency20
Verdict
BenQ EW2770QZ and LG W3000H-Bn are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 49 and 49.
- Resolution: LG W3000H-Bn leads (2560×1600 vs 2560×1440).
- Response time: LG W3000H-Bn leads (5 ms vs 14 ms).
Pick this
LG W3000H-Bn
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ EW2770QZ | LG W3000H-Bn | |
|---|---|---|
| 49 | Gear score | 49 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 30″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1600 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 14 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
| — | Release year | 2007 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ EW2770QZ or LG W3000H-Bn better?
BenQ EW2770QZ and LG W3000H-Bn are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 49 and 49. Resolution: LG W3000H-Bn leads (2560×1600 vs 2560×1440). Response time: LG W3000H-Bn leads (5 ms vs 14 ms).
Similar comparisons
BenQ EW2770QZ vs BenQ BL2381TBenQ EW2770QZ vs BenQ BL3200PTBenQ EW2770QZ vs BenQ PD3200QBenQ EW2770QZ vs ASUS Designo MX279HSBenQ EW2770QZ vs ASUS ProArt Display PA248CRVLG W3000H-Bn vs ASUS Designo MX279HSLG W3000H-Bn vs ASUS ProArt Display PA248CRVLG W3000H-Bn vs ASUS ProArt Display PA248QVLG W3000H-Bn vs BenQ BL2381TLG W3000H-Bn vs BenQ BL3200PT