Monitors / Comparison

BenQ EW2770QZ vs Samsung CH711

Monitor · BenQ

BenQ EW2770QZ

27″ · 2560×1440 · 60 Hz · IPS
GEAR SCORE 49.0 / 100Average
Refresh rate15
Resolution80
Panel80
Response time30
VS
Monitor · Samsung

Samsung CH711

32″ · 2560×1440 · 60 Hz · VA
GEAR SCORE 49.0 / 100Average
Refresh rate15
Resolution80
Panel66
Response time60
Verdict

BenQ EW2770QZ and Samsung CH711 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 49 and 49.

  • Response time: Samsung CH711 leads (4 ms vs 14 ms).
Pick this

Samsung CH711

If you care most about response time.

Spec-by-spec comparison

BenQ EW2770QZSamsung CH711
49Gear score49
27″Screen size32″
2560×1440Resolution2560×1440
60 HzRefresh rate60 Hz
IPSPanelVA
14 msResponse time4 ms

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

Scan my PCSee the leaderboard →

FAQ

Is BenQ EW2770QZ or Samsung CH711 better?

BenQ EW2770QZ and Samsung CH711 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 49 and 49. Response time: Samsung CH711 leads (4 ms vs 14 ms).

Similar comparisons

BenQ EW2770QZ vs BenQ BL2381TBenQ EW2770QZ vs BenQ BL3200PTBenQ EW2770QZ vs BenQ PD3200QBenQ EW2770QZ vs ASUS Designo MX279HSBenQ EW2770QZ vs ASUS ProArt Display PA248CRVSamsung CH711 vs ASUS Designo MX279HSSamsung CH711 vs ASUS ProArt Display PA248CRVSamsung CH711 vs ASUS ProArt Display PA248QVSamsung CH711 vs BenQ BL2381TSamsung CH711 vs BenQ BL3200PT