Monitors / Comparison

BenQ EW3280U vs Wasabi Mango UHD550 REAL 4K HDMI 2.0

Monitor · BenQ

BenQ EW3280U

32″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · IPS
GEAR SCORE 57.0 / 100Good
Refresh rate15
Resolution100
Panel80
Response time50
VS
Monitor · Wasabi

Wasabi Mango UHD550 REAL 4K HDMI 2.0

55″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · IPS
GEAR SCORE 57.0 / 100Good
Refresh rate15
Resolution100
Panel80
Response time50
Verdict

BenQ EW3280U and Wasabi Mango UHD550 REAL 4K HDMI 2.0 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 57 and 57.

Spec-by-spec comparison

BenQ EW3280UWasabi Mango UHD550 REAL 4K HDMI 2.0
57Gear score57
32″Screen size55″
3840×2160Resolution3840×2160
60 HzRefresh rate60 Hz
IPSPanelIPS
5 msResponse time5 ms
≈ $470Estimated price—

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

Scan my PCSee the leaderboard →

FAQ

Is BenQ EW3280U or Wasabi Mango UHD550 REAL 4K HDMI 2.0 better?

BenQ EW3280U and Wasabi Mango UHD550 REAL 4K HDMI 2.0 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 57 and 57.

Similar comparisons

BenQ EW3280U vs BenQ EW2780UBenQ EW3280U vs BenQ EW2880UBenQ EW3280U vs BenQ PD2700UBenQ EW3280U vs ASUS Designo MX27UCSBenQ EW3280U vs ASUS Eye Care VY27UQWasabi Mango UHD550 REAL 4K HDMI 2.0 vs ASUS Designo MX27UCSWasabi Mango UHD550 REAL 4K HDMI 2.0 vs ASUS Eye Care VY27UQWasabi Mango UHD550 REAL 4K HDMI 2.0 vs ASUS MX27UCWasabi Mango UHD550 REAL 4K HDMI 2.0 vs BenQ EW2780UWasabi Mango UHD550 REAL 4K HDMI 2.0 vs BenQ EW2880U