BenQ EX3203R vs Philips 27M2C5201L
BenQ EX3203R
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 144 Hz · VAPhilips 27M2C5201L
27″ · 1920×1080 · 180 Hz · Fast VABenQ EX3203R and Philips 27M2C5201L are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 68 and 68.
- Resolution: BenQ EX3203R leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Philips 27M2C5201L leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: Philips 27M2C5201L leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
BenQ EX3203R
If you care most about resolution.
Philips 27M2C5201L
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ EX3203R | Philips 27M2C5201L | |
|---|---|---|
| 68 | Gear score | 68 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 180 Hz |
| VA | Panel | Fast VA |
| 4 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ EX3203R or Philips 27M2C5201L better?
BenQ EX3203R and Philips 27M2C5201L are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 68 and 68. Resolution: BenQ EX3203R leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Philips 27M2C5201L leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: Philips 27M2C5201L leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips 27M2C5201L leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz).