BenQ MOBIUZ EX240 vs Philips 27M2C5201L
BenQ MOBIUZ EX240
23.8″ · 1920×1080 · 165 Hz · IPSPhilips 27M2C5201L
27″ · 1920×1080 · 180 Hz · Fast VABenQ MOBIUZ EX240 and Philips 27M2C5201L are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 68 and 68.
- Refresh rate: Philips 27M2C5201L leads (180 Hz vs 165 Hz).
- Response time: Philips 27M2C5201L leads (1 ms vs 2 ms).
Philips 27M2C5201L
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ MOBIUZ EX240 | Philips 27M2C5201L | |
|---|---|---|
| 68 | Gear score | 68 |
| 23.8″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 180 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | Fast VA |
| 2 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| ≈ $228 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ MOBIUZ EX240 or Philips 27M2C5201L better?
BenQ MOBIUZ EX240 and Philips 27M2C5201L are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 68 and 68. Refresh rate: Philips 27M2C5201L leads (180 Hz vs 165 Hz). Response time: Philips 27M2C5201L leads (1 ms vs 2 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips 27M2C5201L leads (180 Hz vs 165 Hz).