BenQ MOBIUZ EX3415R vs Corsair XENEON 32QHD165
BenQ MOBIUZ EX3415R
34″ · 3440×1440 · 144 Hz · IPSCorsair XENEON 32QHD165
32″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSBenQ MOBIUZ EX3415R and Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 74.
- Resolution: BenQ MOBIUZ EX3415R leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: BenQ MOBIUZ EX3415R leads (2 ms vs 3 ms).
BenQ MOBIUZ EX3415R
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Corsair XENEON 32QHD165
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ MOBIUZ EX3415R | Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 | |
|---|---|---|
| 75 | Gear score | 74 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 2 ms | Response time | 3 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ MOBIUZ EX3415R or Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 better?
BenQ MOBIUZ EX3415R and Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 74. Resolution: BenQ MOBIUZ EX3415R leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: BenQ MOBIUZ EX3415R leads (2 ms vs 3 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).