Monitors / Comparison
BenQ SW240 vs Samsung FT400
Monitor · BenQ
BenQ SW240
24.1″ · 1920×1200 · 60 Hz · IPSAverage
Refresh rate15
Resolution57
Panel80
Response time50
VS
Monitor · Samsung
Samsung FT400
24″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · IPSAverage
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel80
Response time60
Verdict
BenQ SW240 and Samsung FT400 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 45 and 46.
- Resolution: BenQ SW240 leads (1920×1200 vs 1920×1080).
- Response time: Samsung FT400 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Pick this
BenQ SW240
If you care most about resolution.
Pick this
Samsung FT400
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ SW240 | Samsung FT400 | |
|---|---|---|
| 45 | Gear score | 46 |
| 24.1″ | Screen size | 24″ |
| 1920×1200 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| ≈ $466 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ SW240 or Samsung FT400 better?
BenQ SW240 and Samsung FT400 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 45 and 46. Resolution: BenQ SW240 leads (1920×1200 vs 1920×1080). Response time: Samsung FT400 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).