BenQ XL2540 vs Philips 32M1C5500VL
BenQ XL2540
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 240 Hz · TNPhilips 32M1C5500VL
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · VABenQ XL2540 and Philips 32M1C5500VL are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Resolution: Philips 32M1C5500VL leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: BenQ XL2540 leads (240 Hz vs 165 Hz).
- Response time: BenQ XL2540 leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
BenQ XL2540
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Philips 32M1C5500VL
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ XL2540 | Philips 32M1C5500VL | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 24.5″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 240 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| TN | Panel | VA |
| 1 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ XL2540 or Philips 32M1C5500VL better?
BenQ XL2540 and Philips 32M1C5500VL are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Resolution: Philips 32M1C5500VL leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: BenQ XL2540 leads (240 Hz vs 165 Hz). Response time: BenQ XL2540 leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: BenQ XL2540 leads (240 Hz vs 165 Hz).