Cooler Master GM2711S vs Philips 27M2N3201PL
Cooler Master GM2711S
27″ · 2560×1440 · 180 Hz · IPSPhilips 27M2N3201PL
27″ · 1920×1080 · 260 Hz · Fast IPSCooler Master GM2711S and Philips 27M2N3201PL are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 77 and 77.
- Resolution: Cooler Master GM2711S leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Philips 27M2N3201PL leads (260 Hz vs 180 Hz).
- Response time: Philips 27M2N3201PL leads (1 ms vs 2 ms).
Cooler Master GM2711S
If you care most about resolution.
Philips 27M2N3201PL
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Cooler Master GM2711S | Philips 27M2N3201PL | |
|---|---|---|
| 77 | Gear score | 77 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 180 Hz | Refresh rate | 260 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | Fast IPS |
| 2 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Cooler Master GM2711S or Philips 27M2N3201PL better?
Cooler Master GM2711S and Philips 27M2N3201PL are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 77 and 77. Resolution: Cooler Master GM2711S leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Philips 27M2N3201PL leads (260 Hz vs 180 Hz). Response time: Philips 27M2N3201PL leads (1 ms vs 2 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips 27M2N3201PL leads (260 Hz vs 180 Hz).