Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 vs Dell Alienware AW3225DM
Corsair XENEON 32QHD165
32″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSDell Alienware AW3225DM
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 180 Hz · VACorsair XENEON 32QHD165 and Dell Alienware AW3225DM are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 74 and 75.
- Refresh rate: Dell Alienware AW3225DM leads (180 Hz vs 165 Hz).
- Response time: Dell Alienware AW3225DM leads (1 ms vs 3 ms).
Dell Alienware AW3225DM
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 | Dell Alienware AW3225DM | |
|---|---|---|
| 74 | Gear score | 75 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 180 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 3 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $320 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 or Dell Alienware AW3225DM better?
Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 and Dell Alienware AW3225DM are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 74 and 75. Refresh rate: Dell Alienware AW3225DM leads (180 Hz vs 165 Hz). Response time: Dell Alienware AW3225DM leads (1 ms vs 3 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Dell Alienware AW3225DM leads (180 Hz vs 165 Hz).