Monitors / Comparison

Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 vs Gigabyte M27Q

Monitor · Corsair

Corsair XENEON 32QHD165

32″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPS
GEAR SCORE 74.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate68
Resolution80
Panel80
Response time69
VS
Monitor · Gigabyte

Gigabyte M27Q

27″ · 2560×1440 · 170 Hz · IPS
GEAR SCORE 75.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate69
Resolution80
Panel80
Verdict

Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 and Gigabyte M27Q are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 74 and 75.

  • Refresh rate: Gigabyte M27Q leads (170 Hz vs 165 Hz).
Pick this

Gigabyte M27Q

If you care most about refresh rate.

Spec-by-spec comparison

Corsair XENEON 32QHD165Gigabyte M27Q
74Gear score75
32″Screen size27″
2560×1440Resolution2560×1440
165 HzRefresh rate170 Hz
IPSPanelIPS
3 msResponse time—
—Estimated price≈ $300

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

Scan my PCSee the leaderboard →

FAQ

Is Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 or Gigabyte M27Q better?

Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 and Gigabyte M27Q are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 74 and 75. Refresh rate: Gigabyte M27Q leads (170 Hz vs 165 Hz).

Which has the higher refresh rate?

Refresh rate: Gigabyte M27Q leads (170 Hz vs 165 Hz).

Similar comparisons

Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 vs ASUS ROG Strix XG17AHPCorsair XENEON 32QHD165 vs Razer Raptor 27Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 vs MSI MAG 244FCorsair XENEON 32QHD165 vs MSI MAG 275CQRF-QDCorsair XENEON 32QHD165 vs MSI MAG 325CQRF-QDGigabyte M27Q vs ASUS ROG Strix XG27WCSGigabyte M27Q vs ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCSGigabyte M27Q vs ASUS ROG Strix XG43UQGigabyte M27Q vs BenQ EX270MGigabyte M27Q vs BenQ MOBIUZ EX2710Q