Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 vs Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0)
Corsair XENEON 32QHD165
32″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSGigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0)
27″ · 2560×1440 · 170 Hz · IPSCorsair XENEON 32QHD165 and Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0) are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 74 and 75.
- Refresh rate: Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0) leads (170 Hz vs 165 Hz).
Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0)
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 | Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0) | |
|---|---|---|
| 74 | Gear score | 75 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 170 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 3 ms | Response time | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 or Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0) better?
Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 and Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0) are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 74 and 75. Refresh rate: Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0) leads (170 Hz vs 165 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0) leads (170 Hz vs 165 Hz).