Monitors / Comparison

Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 vs HP Omen 27i

Monitor · Corsair

Corsair XENEON 32QHD165

32″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPS
GEAR SCORE 74.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate68
Resolution80
Panel80
Response time69
VS
Monitor · HP

HP Omen 27i

27″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPS
GEAR SCORE 75.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate68
Resolution80
Panel80
Verdict

Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 and HP Omen 27i are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 74 and 75.

Spec-by-spec comparison

Corsair XENEON 32QHD165HP Omen 27i
74Gear score75
32″Screen size27″
2560×1440Resolution2560×1440
165 HzRefresh rate165 Hz
IPSPanelIPS
3 msResponse time—

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

FAQ

Is Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 or HP Omen 27i better?

Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 and HP Omen 27i are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 74 and 75.