Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 vs LG 27GN850-B
Corsair XENEON 32QHD165
32″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSLG 27GN850-B
27″ · 2560×1440 · 144 Hz · IPSCorsair XENEON 32QHD165 and LG 27GN850-B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 74 and 74.
- Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: LG 27GN850-B leads (1 ms vs 3 ms).
Corsair XENEON 32QHD165
If you care most about refresh rate.
LG 27GN850-B
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 | LG 27GN850-B | |
|---|---|---|
| 74 | Gear score | 74 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 3 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 or LG 27GN850-B better?
Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 and LG 27GN850-B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 74 and 74. Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: LG 27GN850-B leads (1 ms vs 3 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).