Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 vs MSI G322CQP
Corsair XENEON 32QHD165
32″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSMSI G322CQP
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 170 Hz · VACorsair XENEON 32QHD165 and MSI G322CQP are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 74 and 74.
- Refresh rate: MSI G322CQP leads (170 Hz vs 165 Hz).
- Response time: MSI G322CQP leads (1 ms vs 3 ms).
MSI G322CQP
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 | MSI G322CQP | |
|---|---|---|
| 74 | Gear score | 74 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 170 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 3 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 or MSI G322CQP better?
Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 and MSI G322CQP are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 74 and 74. Refresh rate: MSI G322CQP leads (170 Hz vs 165 Hz). Response time: MSI G322CQP leads (1 ms vs 3 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI G322CQP leads (170 Hz vs 165 Hz).