Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 vs Philips Evnia 279M1RV
Corsair XENEON 32QHD165
32″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSPhilips Evnia 279M1RV
27″ · 3840×2160 · 120 Hz · Nano IPSCorsair XENEON 32QHD165 and Philips Evnia 279M1RV are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 74 and 75.
- Resolution: Philips Evnia 279M1RV leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz).
- Response time: Philips Evnia 279M1RV leads (1 ms vs 3 ms).
Corsair XENEON 32QHD165
If you care most about refresh rate.
Philips Evnia 279M1RV
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 | Philips Evnia 279M1RV | |
|---|---|---|
| 74 | Gear score | 75 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 120 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | Nano IPS |
| 3 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $740 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 or Philips Evnia 279M1RV better?
Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 and Philips Evnia 279M1RV are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 74 and 75. Resolution: Philips Evnia 279M1RV leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz). Response time: Philips Evnia 279M1RV leads (1 ms vs 3 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz).