Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 vs Samsung Odyssey G9 S49FG916
Corsair XENEON 32QHD165
32″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSSamsung Odyssey G9 S49FG916
48.7″ · 5120×1440 · 144 Hz · VACorsair XENEON 32QHD165 and Samsung Odyssey G9 S49FG916 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 74 and 74.
- Resolution: Samsung Odyssey G9 S49FG916 leads (5120×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).
Corsair XENEON 32QHD165
If you care most about refresh rate.
Samsung Odyssey G9 S49FG916
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 | Samsung Odyssey G9 S49FG916 | |
|---|---|---|
| 74 | Gear score | 74 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 48.7″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 5120×1440 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 3 ms | Response time | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 or Samsung Odyssey G9 S49FG916 better?
Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 and Samsung Odyssey G9 S49FG916 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 74 and 74. Resolution: Samsung Odyssey G9 S49FG916 leads (5120×1440 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).