Monitors / Comparison

Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 vs Sceptre C345B-QUT168

Monitor · Corsair

Corsair XENEON 32QHD165

32″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPS
GEAR SCORE 74.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate68
Resolution80
Panel80
Response time69
VS
Monitor · Sceptre

Sceptre C345B-QUT168

34″ · 3440×1440 · 165 Hz · VA
GEAR SCORE 74.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate68
Resolution88
Panel66
Verdict

Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 and Sceptre C345B-QUT168 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 74 and 74.

  • Resolution: Sceptre C345B-QUT168 leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440).
Pick this

Sceptre C345B-QUT168

If you care most about resolution.

Spec-by-spec comparison

Corsair XENEON 32QHD165Sceptre C345B-QUT168
74Gear score74
32″Screen size34″
2560×1440Resolution3440×1440
165 HzRefresh rate165 Hz
IPSPanelVA
3 msResponse time—

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

Scan my PCSee the leaderboard →

FAQ

Is Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 or Sceptre C345B-QUT168 better?

Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 and Sceptre C345B-QUT168 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 74 and 74. Resolution: Sceptre C345B-QUT168 leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440).

Similar comparisons

Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 vs ASUS ROG Strix XG17AHPCorsair XENEON 32QHD165 vs Razer Raptor 27Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 vs MSI MAG 244FCorsair XENEON 32QHD165 vs MSI MAG 275CQRF-QDCorsair XENEON 32QHD165 vs MSI MAG 325CQRF-QDSceptre C345B-QUT168 vs ASUS ROG Strix XG17AHPSceptre C345B-QUT168 vs Razer Raptor 27Sceptre C345B-QUT168 vs MSI MAG 244FSceptre C345B-QUT168 vs MSI MAG 275CQRF-QD