Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 vs GamePower Lucid S40
Corsair XENEON 32QHD240
32″ · 2560×1440 · 240 Hz · IPSGamePower Lucid S40
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 400 Hz · VACorsair XENEON 32QHD240 and GamePower Lucid S40 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 79 and 79.
- Resolution: Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: GamePower Lucid S40 leads (400 Hz vs 240 Hz).
- Response time: GamePower Lucid S40 leads (0.2 ms vs 5 ms).
Corsair XENEON 32QHD240
If you care most about resolution.
GamePower Lucid S40
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 | GamePower Lucid S40 | |
|---|---|---|
| 79 | Gear score | 79 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 24.5″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 240 Hz | Refresh rate | 400 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | 0.2 ms |
| ≈ $700 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 or GamePower Lucid S40 better?
Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 and GamePower Lucid S40 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 79 and 79. Resolution: Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: GamePower Lucid S40 leads (400 Hz vs 240 Hz). Response time: GamePower Lucid S40 leads (0.2 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: GamePower Lucid S40 leads (400 Hz vs 240 Hz).