Monitors / Comparison

Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 vs HP OMEN 27c

Monitor · Corsair

Corsair XENEON 32QHD240

32″ · 2560×1440 · 240 Hz · IPS
GEAR SCORE 79.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate86
Resolution80
Panel80
Response time50
VS
Monitor · HP

HP OMEN 27c

27″ · 2560×1440 · 240 Hz · VA
GEAR SCORE 79.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate86
Resolution80
Panel66
Verdict

Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 and HP OMEN 27c are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 79 and 79.

Spec-by-spec comparison

Corsair XENEON 32QHD240HP OMEN 27c
79Gear score79
32″Screen size27″
2560×1440Resolution2560×1440
240 HzRefresh rate240 Hz
IPSPanelVA
5 msResponse time—
≈ $700Estimated price—

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

Scan my PCSee the leaderboard →

FAQ

Is Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 or HP OMEN 27c better?

Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 and HP OMEN 27c are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 79 and 79.

Similar comparisons

Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 vs ASUS ROG Strix XG259CMSCorsair XENEON 32QHD240 vs MSI MAG 275QFCorsair XENEON 32QHD240 vs MSI MPG Artymis 273CQRX-QDCorsair XENEON 32QHD240 vs MSI G274QPF E2Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 vs BenQ MOBIUZ EX381UHP OMEN 27c vs ASUS ROG Strix XG259CMSHP OMEN 27c vs MSI MAG 275QFHP OMEN 27c vs MSI MPG Artymis 273CQRX-QDHP OMEN 27c vs MSI G274QPF E2