Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 vs LG 38GL950G-B
Corsair XENEON 32QHD240
32″ · 2560×1440 · 240 Hz · IPSLG 38GL950G-B
37.5″ · 3840×1600 · 175 Hz · IPSCorsair XENEON 32QHD240 and LG 38GL950G-B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 79 and 80.
- Resolution: LG 38GL950G-B leads (3840×1600 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 leads (240 Hz vs 175 Hz).
Corsair XENEON 32QHD240
If you care most about refresh rate.
LG 38GL950G-B
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 | LG 38GL950G-B | |
|---|---|---|
| 79 | Gear score | 80 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 37.5″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3840×1600 |
| 240 Hz | Refresh rate | 175 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | — |
| ≈ $700 | Estimated price | ≈ $1,390 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 or LG 38GL950G-B better?
Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 and LG 38GL950G-B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 79 and 80. Resolution: LG 38GL950G-B leads (3840×1600 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 leads (240 Hz vs 175 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 leads (240 Hz vs 175 Hz).
How much do they cost?
Estimated prices: Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 ≈ $700, LG 38GL950G-B ≈ $1,390. Current prices vary by store.