Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 vs LG UltraGear 32GR93U-B
Corsair XENEON 32QHD240
32″ · 2560×1440 · 240 Hz · IPSLG UltraGear 32GR93U-B
32″ · 3840×2160 · 144 Hz · IPSCorsair XENEON 32QHD240 and LG UltraGear 32GR93U-B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 79 and 80.
- Resolution: LG UltraGear 32GR93U-B leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 leads (240 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: LG UltraGear 32GR93U-B leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
Corsair XENEON 32QHD240
If you care most about refresh rate.
LG UltraGear 32GR93U-B
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 | LG UltraGear 32GR93U-B | |
|---|---|---|
| 79 | Gear score | 80 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 240 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| ≈ $700 | Estimated price | ≈ $590 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 or LG UltraGear 32GR93U-B better?
Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 and LG UltraGear 32GR93U-B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 79 and 80. Resolution: LG UltraGear 32GR93U-B leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 leads (240 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: LG UltraGear 32GR93U-B leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 leads (240 Hz vs 144 Hz).
How much do they cost?
Estimated prices: Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 ≈ $700, LG UltraGear 32GR93U-B ≈ $590. Current prices vary by store.