Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 vs LG UltraGear 34GP950G-B
Corsair XENEON 32QHD240
32″ · 2560×1440 · 240 Hz · IPSLG UltraGear 34GP950G-B
34″ · 3440×1440 · 180 Hz · IPSCorsair XENEON 32QHD240 and LG UltraGear 34GP950G-B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 79 and 80.
- Resolution: LG UltraGear 34GP950G-B leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 leads (240 Hz vs 180 Hz).
- Response time: LG UltraGear 34GP950G-B leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
Corsair XENEON 32QHD240
If you care most about refresh rate.
LG UltraGear 34GP950G-B
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 | LG UltraGear 34GP950G-B | |
|---|---|---|
| 79 | Gear score | 80 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 34″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 240 Hz | Refresh rate | 180 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| ≈ $700 | Estimated price | ≈ $1,810 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 or LG UltraGear 34GP950G-B better?
Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 and LG UltraGear 34GP950G-B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 79 and 80. Resolution: LG UltraGear 34GP950G-B leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 leads (240 Hz vs 180 Hz). Response time: LG UltraGear 34GP950G-B leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 leads (240 Hz vs 180 Hz).
How much do they cost?
Estimated prices: Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 ≈ $700, LG UltraGear 34GP950G-B ≈ $1,810. Current prices vary by store.