Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 vs Samsung ARK
Corsair XENEON 32QHD240
32″ · 2560×1440 · 240 Hz · IPSSamsung ARK
55″ · 3840×2160 · 165 Hz · VACorsair XENEON 32QHD240 and Samsung ARK are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 79 and 79.
- Resolution: Samsung ARK leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 leads (240 Hz vs 165 Hz).
- Response time: Samsung ARK leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
Corsair XENEON 32QHD240
If you care most about refresh rate.
Samsung ARK
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 | Samsung ARK | |
|---|---|---|
| 79 | Gear score | 79 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 55″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 240 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| ≈ $700 | Estimated price | ≈ $1,500 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 or Samsung ARK better?
Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 and Samsung ARK are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 79 and 79. Resolution: Samsung ARK leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 leads (240 Hz vs 165 Hz). Response time: Samsung ARK leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 leads (240 Hz vs 165 Hz).
How much do they cost?
Estimated prices: Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 ≈ $700, Samsung ARK ≈ $1,500. Current prices vary by store.