Monitors / Comparison

Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 vs Samsung Odyssey G6 S32BG652EU

Monitor · Corsair

Corsair XENEON 32QHD240

32″ · 2560×1440 · 240 Hz · IPS
GEAR SCORE 79.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate86
Resolution80
Panel80
Response time50
VS
Monitor · Samsung

Samsung Odyssey G6 S32BG652EU

32″ · 2560×1440 · 240 Hz · VA
GEAR SCORE 79.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate86
Resolution80
Panel66
Verdict

Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 and Samsung Odyssey G6 S32BG652EU are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 79 and 79.

Spec-by-spec comparison

Corsair XENEON 32QHD240Samsung Odyssey G6 S32BG652EU
79Gear score79
32″Screen size32″
2560×1440Resolution2560×1440
240 HzRefresh rate240 Hz
IPSPanelVA
5 msResponse time—
≈ $700Estimated price—

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

FAQ

Is Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 or Samsung Odyssey G6 S32BG652EU better?

Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 and Samsung Odyssey G6 S32BG652EU are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 79 and 79.