Monitors / Comparison
Dell 1909W vs Philips 220B4LPCB
Monitor · Dell
Dell 1909W
19″ · 1440×900 · 60 Hz · TNEntry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution32
Panel50
Response time50
VS
Monitor · Philips
Philips 220B4LPCB
22″ · 1680×1050 · 60 HzEntry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution46
Response time50
Verdict
Dell 1909W and Philips 220B4LPCB are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 31 and 31.
- Resolution: Philips 220B4LPCB leads (1680×1050 vs 1440×900).
Pick this
Philips 220B4LPCB
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Dell 1909W | Philips 220B4LPCB | |
|---|---|---|
| 31 | Gear score | 31 |
| 19″ | Screen size | 22″ |
| 1440×900 | Resolution | 1680×1050 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| TN | Panel | — |
| 5 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Dell 1909W or Philips 220B4LPCB better?
Dell 1909W and Philips 220B4LPCB are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 31 and 31. Resolution: Philips 220B4LPCB leads (1680×1050 vs 1440×900).