Monitors / Comparison

Dell E2014H vs NEC E172M-BK

Monitor · Dell

Dell E2014H

19.5″ · 1600×900 · 60 Hz · TN · 2013
GEAR SCORE 31.0 / 100Entry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution36
Panel50
Response time50
Recency20
VS
Monitor · NEC

NEC E172M-BK

17″ · 1280×1024 · 60 Hz · TN
GEAR SCORE 31.0 / 100Entry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution33
Panel50
Response time47
Verdict

Dell E2014H and NEC E172M-BK are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 31 and 31.

  • Resolution: Dell E2014H leads (1600×900 vs 1280×1024).
  • Response time: Dell E2014H leads (5 ms vs 5.5 ms).
Pick this

Dell E2014H

If you care most about resolution, response time.

Spec-by-spec comparison

Dell E2014HNEC E172M-BK
31Gear score31
19.5″Screen size17″
1600×900Resolution1280×1024
60 HzRefresh rate60 Hz
TNPanelTN
5 msResponse time5.5 ms
2013Release year—
—Estimated price≈ $190

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

FAQ

Is Dell E2014H or NEC E172M-BK better?

Dell E2014H and NEC E172M-BK are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 31 and 31. Resolution: Dell E2014H leads (1600×900 vs 1280×1024). Response time: Dell E2014H leads (5 ms vs 5.5 ms).