Eizo ColorEdge CG2700X vs LG W2363D-PU
Eizo ColorEdge CG2700X
27″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · IPSLG W2363D-PU
23″ · 1920×1080 · 120 Hz · TNEizo ColorEdge CG2700X and LG W2363D-PU are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 55 and 54.
- Resolution: Eizo ColorEdge CG2700X leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: LG W2363D-PU leads (120 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: LG W2363D-PU leads (3 ms vs 13 ms).
Eizo ColorEdge CG2700X
If you care most about resolution.
LG W2363D-PU
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Eizo ColorEdge CG2700X | LG W2363D-PU | |
|---|---|---|
| 55 | Gear score | 54 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 23″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 120 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | TN |
| 13 ms | Response time | 3 ms |
| ≈ $3,390 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Eizo ColorEdge CG2700X or LG W2363D-PU better?
Eizo ColorEdge CG2700X and LG W2363D-PU are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 55 and 54. Resolution: Eizo ColorEdge CG2700X leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: LG W2363D-PU leads (120 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: LG W2363D-PU leads (3 ms vs 13 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: LG W2363D-PU leads (120 Hz vs 60 Hz).