Gigabyte AORUS FO48U vs Gigabyte G34WQC2
Gigabyte AORUS FO48U
47.5″ · 3840×2160 · 120 Hz · OLED · 2021Gigabyte G34WQC2
34″ · 3440×1440 · 200 Hz · VAGigabyte AORUS FO48U and Gigabyte G34WQC2 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 78 and 78.
- Resolution: Gigabyte AORUS FO48U leads (3840×2160 vs 3440×1440).
- Refresh rate: Gigabyte G34WQC2 leads (200 Hz vs 120 Hz).
Gigabyte AORUS FO48U
If you care most about resolution.
Gigabyte G34WQC2
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Gigabyte AORUS FO48U | Gigabyte G34WQC2 | |
|---|---|---|
| 78 | Gear score | 78 |
| 47.5″ | Screen size | 34″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 120 Hz | Refresh rate | 200 Hz |
| OLED | Panel | VA |
| 1 ms | Response time | — |
| 2021 | Release year | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Gigabyte AORUS FO48U or Gigabyte G34WQC2 better?
Gigabyte AORUS FO48U and Gigabyte G34WQC2 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 78 and 78. Resolution: Gigabyte AORUS FO48U leads (3840×2160 vs 3440×1440). Refresh rate: Gigabyte G34WQC2 leads (200 Hz vs 120 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Gigabyte G34WQC2 leads (200 Hz vs 120 Hz).