Monitors / Comparison
Gigabyte AORUS FO48U vs Gigabyte M32U
Monitor · Gigabyte
Gigabyte AORUS FO48U
47.5″ · 3840×2160 · 120 Hz · OLED · 2021Very good
Refresh rate50
Resolution100
Panel100
Response time90
Recency60
VS
Monitor · Gigabyte
Gigabyte M32U
31.5″ · 3840×2160 · 144 Hz · IPSVery good
Refresh rate62
Resolution100
Panel80
Verdict
Gigabyte AORUS FO48U and Gigabyte M32U are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 78 and 78.
- Refresh rate: Gigabyte M32U leads (144 Hz vs 120 Hz).
Pick this
Gigabyte M32U
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Gigabyte AORUS FO48U | Gigabyte M32U | |
|---|---|---|
| 78 | Gear score | 78 |
| 47.5″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 120 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| OLED | Panel | IPS |
| 1 ms | Response time | — |
| 2021 | Release year | — |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $730 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Gigabyte AORUS FO48U or Gigabyte M32U better?
Gigabyte AORUS FO48U and Gigabyte M32U are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 78 and 78. Refresh rate: Gigabyte M32U leads (144 Hz vs 120 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Gigabyte M32U leads (144 Hz vs 120 Hz).
Similar comparisons
Gigabyte AORUS FO48U vs ASUS ROG Strix XG249CMGigabyte AORUS FO48U vs ASUS ROG Strix XG27ACGGigabyte AORUS FO48U vs ASUS ROG Strix XG27ACSGigabyte AORUS FO48U vs BenQ MOBIUZ EX3210UGigabyte AORUS FO48U vs MSI MAG 272F X24Gigabyte M32U vs ASUS ROG Strix XG249CMGigabyte M32U vs ASUS ROG Strix XG27ACGGigabyte M32U vs ASUS ROG Strix XG27ACSGigabyte M32U vs BenQ MOBIUZ EX3210UGigabyte M32U vs MSI MAG 272F X24