Gigabyte AORUS FO48U vs MSI MAG 255F X24
Gigabyte AORUS FO48U
47.5″ · 3840×2160 · 120 Hz · OLED · 2021MSI MAG 255F X24
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 240 Hz · Rapid IPSGigabyte AORUS FO48U and MSI MAG 255F X24 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 78 and 77.
- Resolution: Gigabyte AORUS FO48U leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: MSI MAG 255F X24 leads (240 Hz vs 120 Hz).
- Response time: MSI MAG 255F X24 leads (0.5 ms vs 1 ms).
Gigabyte AORUS FO48U
If you care most about resolution.
MSI MAG 255F X24
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Gigabyte AORUS FO48U | MSI MAG 255F X24 | |
|---|---|---|
| 78 | Gear score | 77 |
| 47.5″ | Screen size | 24.5″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 120 Hz | Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| OLED | Panel | Rapid IPS |
| 1 ms | Response time | 0.5 ms |
| 2021 | Release year | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Gigabyte AORUS FO48U or MSI MAG 255F X24 better?
Gigabyte AORUS FO48U and MSI MAG 255F X24 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 78 and 77. Resolution: Gigabyte AORUS FO48U leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: MSI MAG 255F X24 leads (240 Hz vs 120 Hz). Response time: MSI MAG 255F X24 leads (0.5 ms vs 1 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI MAG 255F X24 leads (240 Hz vs 120 Hz).