Gigabyte AORUS FV43U vs MSI MAG 255F E20
Gigabyte AORUS FV43U
43″ · 3840×2160 · 144 Hz · VAMSI MAG 255F E20
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 200 Hz · Rapid IPSGigabyte AORUS FV43U and MSI MAG 255F E20 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 74.
- Resolution: Gigabyte AORUS FV43U leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: MSI MAG 255F E20 leads (200 Hz vs 144 Hz).
Gigabyte AORUS FV43U
If you care most about resolution.
MSI MAG 255F E20
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Gigabyte AORUS FV43U | MSI MAG 255F E20 | |
|---|---|---|
| 75 | Gear score | 74 |
| 43″ | Screen size | 24.5″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 200 Hz |
| VA | Panel | Rapid IPS |
| — | Response time | 0.5 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Gigabyte AORUS FV43U or MSI MAG 255F E20 better?
Gigabyte AORUS FV43U and MSI MAG 255F E20 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 74. Resolution: Gigabyte AORUS FV43U leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: MSI MAG 255F E20 leads (200 Hz vs 144 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI MAG 255F E20 leads (200 Hz vs 144 Hz).