Gigabyte M27UA vs MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD
Gigabyte M27UA
27″ · 3840×2160 · 160 Hz · IPSMSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD
27″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSGigabyte M27UA and MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 77 and 76.
- Resolution: Gigabyte M27UA leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD leads (165 Hz vs 160 Hz).
- Response time: MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
Gigabyte M27UA
If you care most about resolution.
MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Gigabyte M27UA | MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD | |
|---|---|---|
| 77 | Gear score | 76 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 160 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| ≈ $450 | Estimated price | ≈ $369 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Gigabyte M27UA or MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD better?
Gigabyte M27UA and MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 77 and 76. Resolution: Gigabyte M27UA leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD leads (165 Hz vs 160 Hz). Response time: MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD leads (165 Hz vs 160 Hz).
How much do they cost?
Estimated prices: Gigabyte M27UA ≈ $450, MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD ≈ $369. Current prices vary by store.