Monitors / Comparison
HP Omen 32c vs Razer Raptor 27
Monitor · HP
HP Omen 32c
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · VAVery good
Refresh rate68
Resolution80
Panel66
Response time90
VS
Monitor · Razer
Razer Raptor 27
27″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSVery good
Refresh rate68
Resolution80
Panel80
Response time60
Verdict
HP Omen 32c and Razer Raptor 27 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 73 and 73.
- Response time: HP Omen 32c leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
Pick this
HP Omen 32c
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| HP Omen 32c | Razer Raptor 27 | |
|---|---|---|
| 73 | Gear score | 73 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| VA | Panel | IPS |
| 1 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| ≈ $320 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is HP Omen 32c or Razer Raptor 27 better?
HP Omen 32c and Razer Raptor 27 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 73 and 73. Response time: HP Omen 32c leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
Similar comparisons
HP Omen 32c vs Corsair XENEON 32UHD144HP Omen 32c vs Corsair XENEON 32UHD144-AHP Omen 32c vs ASUS PG279Q ROG SwiftHP Omen 32c vs ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279QZRazer Raptor 27 vs Corsair XENEON 32UHD144Razer Raptor 27 vs Corsair XENEON 32UHD144-ARazer Raptor 27 vs ASUS PG279Q ROG SwiftRazer Raptor 27 vs ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279QZRazer Raptor 27 vs ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ