Monitors / Comparison

ASUS PG279Q ROG Swift vs HP Omen 32c

Monitor · ASUS

ASUS PG279Q ROG Swift

27″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPS
GEAR SCORE 73.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate68
Resolution80
Panel80
Response time60
VS
Monitor · HP

HP Omen 32c

31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · VA
GEAR SCORE 73.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate68
Resolution80
Panel66
Response time90
Verdict

ASUS PG279Q ROG Swift and HP Omen 32c are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 73 and 73.

  • Response time: HP Omen 32c leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
Pick this

HP Omen 32c

If you care most about response time.

Spec-by-spec comparison

ASUS PG279Q ROG SwiftHP Omen 32c
73Gear score73
27″Screen size31.5″
2560×1440Resolution2560×1440
165 HzRefresh rate165 Hz
IPSPanelVA
4 msResponse time1 ms
—Estimated price≈ $320

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

Scan my PCSee the leaderboard →

FAQ

Is ASUS PG279Q ROG Swift or HP Omen 32c better?

ASUS PG279Q ROG Swift and HP Omen 32c are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 73 and 73. Response time: HP Omen 32c leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).

Similar comparisons

ASUS PG279Q ROG Swift vs ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279QZASUS PG279Q ROG Swift vs ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQASUS PG279Q ROG Swift vs Razer Raptor 27ASUS PG279Q ROG Swift vs Corsair XENEON 32UHD144ASUS PG279Q ROG Swift vs Corsair XENEON ​32UHD144-AHP Omen 32c vs Razer Raptor 27HP Omen 32c vs Corsair XENEON 32UHD144HP Omen 32c vs Corsair XENEON ​32UHD144-AHP Omen 32c vs ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279QZ