Monitors / Comparison
LG 25UM58 vs Philips 240B9/00
Monitor · LG
LG 25UM58
25″ · 2560×1080 · 75 Hz · IPSAverage
Refresh rate25
Resolution62
Panel80
Response time50
VS
Monitor · Philips
Philips 240B9/00
24.1″ · 1920×1200 · 75 Hz · IPSAverage
Refresh rate25
Resolution57
Panel80
Response time60
Verdict
LG 25UM58 and Philips 240B9/00 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 50 and 50.
- Resolution: LG 25UM58 leads (2560×1080 vs 1920×1200).
- Response time: Philips 240B9/00 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Pick this
LG 25UM58
If you care most about resolution.
Pick this
Philips 240B9/00
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG 25UM58 | Philips 240B9/00 | |
|---|---|---|
| 50 | Gear score | 50 |
| 25″ | Screen size | 24.1″ |
| 2560×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1200 |
| 75 Hz | Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG 25UM58 or Philips 240B9/00 better?
LG 25UM58 and Philips 240B9/00 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 50 and 50. Resolution: LG 25UM58 leads (2560×1080 vs 1920×1200). Response time: Philips 240B9/00 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).