LG 26WQ500-B vs Philips 240B9/00
LG 26WQ500-B
25.7″ · 2560×1080 · 75 Hz · IPSPhilips 240B9/00
24.1″ · 1920×1200 · 75 Hz · IPSLG 26WQ500-B and Philips 240B9/00 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 50 and 50.
- Resolution: LG 26WQ500-B leads (2560×1080 vs 1920×1200).
- Response time: Philips 240B9/00 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
LG 26WQ500-B
If you care most about resolution.
Philips 240B9/00
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG 26WQ500-B | Philips 240B9/00 | |
|---|---|---|
| 50 | Gear score | 50 |
| 25.7″ | Screen size | 24.1″ |
| 2560×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1200 |
| 75 Hz | Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| ≈ $250 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG 26WQ500-B or Philips 240B9/00 better?
LG 26WQ500-B and Philips 240B9/00 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 50 and 50. Resolution: LG 26WQ500-B leads (2560×1080 vs 1920×1200). Response time: Philips 240B9/00 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).