LG 27GL850-B vs LG 49WQ95C-W
LG 27GL850-B
27″ · 2560×1440 · 144 Hz · IPSLG 49WQ95C-W
49″ · 5120×1440 · 144 Hz · Nano IPSLG 27GL850-B and LG 49WQ95C-W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 74 and 74.
- Resolution: LG 49WQ95C-W leads (5120×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Response time: LG 27GL850-B leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
LG 27GL850-B
If you care most about response time.
LG 49WQ95C-W
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG 27GL850-B | LG 49WQ95C-W | |
|---|---|---|
| 74 | Gear score | 74 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 49″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 5120×1440 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | Nano IPS |
| 1 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
| ≈ $301 | Estimated price | ≈ $1,500 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG 27GL850-B or LG 49WQ95C-W better?
LG 27GL850-B and LG 49WQ95C-W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 74 and 74. Resolution: LG 49WQ95C-W leads (5120×1440 vs 2560×1440). Response time: LG 27GL850-B leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
How much do they cost?
Estimated prices: LG 27GL850-B ≈ $301, LG 49WQ95C-W ≈ $1,500. Current prices vary by store.