LG 34GL750-B vs Philips 34B2U5600C/00
LG 34GL750-B
34″ · 2560×1080 · 144 Hz · IPSPhilips 34B2U5600C/00
34″ · 3440×1440 · 120 Hz · VALG 34GL750-B and Philips 34B2U5600C/00 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 65 and 65.
- Resolution: Philips 34B2U5600C/00 leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1080).
- Refresh rate: LG 34GL750-B leads (144 Hz vs 120 Hz).
- Response time: Philips 34B2U5600C/00 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
LG 34GL750-B
If you care most about refresh rate.
Philips 34B2U5600C/00
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG 34GL750-B | Philips 34B2U5600C/00 | |
|---|---|---|
| 65 | Gear score | 65 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 34″ |
| 2560×1080 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 120 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $600 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG 34GL750-B or Philips 34B2U5600C/00 better?
LG 34GL750-B and Philips 34B2U5600C/00 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 65 and 65. Resolution: Philips 34B2U5600C/00 leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1080). Refresh rate: LG 34GL750-B leads (144 Hz vs 120 Hz). Response time: Philips 34B2U5600C/00 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: LG 34GL750-B leads (144 Hz vs 120 Hz).